This web site was started by people who are motivated by the book Democracy in Chains by Nancy MacLean (click for review), about how the Koch brothers and their network of billionaires have gained and are gaining even more power over the government and people of the United States, destroying our environment and our democracy. Amid that debate, the libertarian Cato Institute, funded by the brothers Charles and David Koch, made privatization of Social Security its top priority and turned to Buchanan for a master plan. DEMOCRACY IN CHAINS The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America By Nancy MacLean 334 pp. Democracy In Chains : A review of Nancy MacLean’s book subtitled ‘The deep history of the radical right’s stealth plan for America’ ... Democracy must therefore be managed and manipulated, and this should not be done in a haphazard way but via a strategically planned long game. There is a plot, illegal or not, to subvert our country and make the rich rich. In September 1973, Buchanan held the inaugural meeting of the International Atlantic Economic Society, arguing for the need to “create, support and activate an effective counterintelligentsia” to reshape the way people thought about government. By the conclusion of the book, one is left to wonder whether the “stealth plan” MacLean wishes to unveil belongs not to some amorphous entity known as “the radical right,” but is simply the property (that’s the right term here) of Charles Koch. Instead she steers us toward Buchanan’s fateful alliance with Charles Koch, who remains, it seems, the true dark prophet of “the radical right’s stealth plan,” its Darth Vader or even its emperor. Nancy MacLean. Yet her questions remain important and well worth pondering. This book is a cautionary read that tells you why you need to vote. Buchanan was concerned that this would lead to overinvestment in public services, as the majority would be all too willing to tax the wealthy minority to support these programs. Although the numerous detractors she immediately attracted as soon as her book was published argue that MacLean has misused various sources, her reconstruction of Buchanan’s career has a solid evidentiary foundation. So Buchanan came to a radical conclusion: Majority rule was an economic problem. But even in 1950s Virginia, public schools were popular with many white parents, and “a fire sale of tax-funded public schools to private school operators would be political suicide,” MacLean writes. Insight into this conundrum comes from an unlikely source, the life’s work of the economist James McGill Buchanan — who happens to be the subject of a new book, “Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America,” by the historian Nancy MacLean. First, it does not shrink from acknowledging the existence of a conspiracy working against the interests of the ordinary folk. Viking. Nancy MacLean, in her book Democracy in Chains describes a long term and effective movement to undermine democracy in the U.S. As he was known for saying, “the problems of our times require attention to the rules rather than the rulers.” In 1986, he was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science for “his development of the contractual and constitutional bases for the theory of economic and political decision making.”. . Buchanan, however, also had what MacLean calls a “stealth” agenda. The election of Ronald Reagan as president in 1980 was a watershed for conservatives, yet it quickly became clear that he, too, would succumb to political pressure. MacLean’s journalistic turn gives her book an admirable polemical vigor that makes it fun to read—especially for anyone who has never read Ayn Rand and is free from libertarian leanings or radical-right credentials. Buchanan, who was born in 1919 and died in 2013, advanced the field of public choice economics into politics, arguing that all interest groups push for their own agenda rather than the public good. In the ensuing years, he sought to lead an economic and political movement in which he stressed that “conspiratorial secrecy is at all times essential” to mask efforts to protect the wealthy elite from the will of the majority. Not of her other work, however, which as I have said is admirably academic and careful. He believed the center-left controlled academia and “effectively indoctrinated political actors in both parties,” MacLean writes. Any reader of Democracy in Chains must keep these concerns in mind. Book Review: Democracy in Chains (by Nancy MacLean) I have rarely accepted conspiracies, which are often embraced too readily. Earlier this year, … Instead, she portrays them as participants in a far-reaching conspiracy. $28.. Munger Reviews "Democracy in Chains" Epic. Last week, I learned that both anti-immigration activist Stephen Miller and white nationalist Richard Spencer were students at Duke in 2006 when the lacrosse scandal consumed our town and the nation. Buchanan had no particular brief for maintaining racial hierarchies or waging a white supremacist campaign of massive resistance. And if the latter is indeed the case, and the key challenge is to grasp the origins and dimensions of the Koch project, readers might still prefer the acclaimed journalist Jane Mayer’s Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right (2017). They and their friends have invested enormous sums in organizations that have changed the national debate about the proper role of government in the economy. Public choice economists argue that those with the most to lose from change will pay the most attention, which has certainly been the case with Charles and David Koch. Jack Rakove reviews Democracy in Chains. Her book reveals how various political operators, without the public’s knowledge, subvert our institutions. New York: Viking, 2017. Buchanan may not have been the only actor in this movement, and the role of conservative donors and economists has been documented elsewhere, but we are now living in a world he helped shepherd into reality. In “Dark Money,” Jane Mayer tells the tale of the Koch brothers. It is rare that a book takes me a full 3 weeks to read when checked out from the library. This revelatory work of scholarship is also a call to arms to protect the achievements of twentieth-century American self-government. The author, Nancy MacLean, is an award-winning writer and professor of History and Public Policy at Duke University. It is disturbing, revealing, and vitally important.” —NYJournalOfBooks.com “Perhaps the best explanation to date of the roots of the political divide that threatens to irrevocably alter American government.” —Booklist (starred review) In her account, Buchanan finally provided Koch with the fully articulated ideology he needed to rationalize his own political preferences. The very idea that there is really an existing “stealth plan” for the subversion of American democracy might strike some readers of Nancy MacLean’s new book as the latest iteration of the great theme of Richard Hofstadter’s famous essay on “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.”[1] If such a conspiracy exists, as MacLean implies, its origins lie in a most curious place. George Monbiot reviews Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America by Nancy MacLean: The Guardian, July 19, 2017: theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/ju... James M. Buchanan in The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan advocates totalitarianism in defense of the freedom of the rich to do what they will, at the expense of everyone else. We know all of this because MacLean found documentation of Buchanan’s plans — including correspondence, meeting minutes and personal papers — in his previously unexplored archives. Dalia "Once I realized that this was the approach, the larger point became clear: Democracy in Chains is a work of speculative historical fiction." “Democracy in Chains should be read by every thinking person in the United States. MacLean has done a significant amount of archival research, well documented in her notes. The political scientist Steven M. Teles writes about the chemicals magnate John M. Olin in “The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement.”. She came upon her biographical subject “by sheer serendipity,” she writes, while researching how the state of Virginia responded to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. 368 pp. Review by Jack Rakove. There is no question that Buchanan’s ideas have become part of our political discourse, even if the portion of Americans who would recognize his name is minuscule. As chair of the economics department at the University of Virginia, Buchanan was empowered to set up a center for political economy that pursued his libertarian agenda. In “Democracy In Chains,” MacLean draws a connection between billionaires, politicians and the practice of law in America and how all of it is weighted heavily toward the side of property owners using ideals that were in place when slavery was still legal. 5.0 out of 5 stars Democracy in Chains is a must read in our time. A Review Essay of Nancy Maclean's Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America Journal of Economic Literature, Forthcoming 63 Pages Posted: 22 May 2018 Last revised: 2 Jun 2018 DEMOCRACY IN CHAINS The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America By Nancy MacLean 334 pp. Buchanan decided he needed to influence policy at a deeper level. That it Nevertheless, her overt moral revulsion at her subject can sometimes make it seem as if we’re getting only part of the picture. Viking. Somehow the idea that they can be rooted in the academic writings of James Buchanan remains a curious and highly problematic explanation. all interest groups push for their own agenda. In the United States, promising and then delivering services and protections for the majority of voters provides a path for politicians to be popularly elected. If his review was just syllogisms and free-standing normative arguments those wouldn't be invalidated. 368 pp. Democracy In Chains took me this long not because it was difficult material, but because it's so incredibly depressing. Our politically polarized and increasingly paralyzed government institutions are the result. One part of his plan involved Social Security. . In her review for the History of Political Economy, Jennifer Burns wrote that "the narrative of American history [Democracy in Chains] presents is insular and highly politicized, laying out a drama of good versus evil with little attention paid to the larger worlds—global, economic, or … Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America. Buchanan’s plan failed, and he learned a tough lesson from this foray into policy making: If the majority demands services such as free public schools, politicians will acquiesce. Buchanan told them that “those who seek to undermine the existing structure” must do two things: Make people doubt the viability of Social Security, and divide the public by suggesting high earners be taxed at higher rates — which might sound progressive but would ultimately undo the universal foundation of the program itself. It is disturbing, revealing, and vitally important.” —NYJournalOfBooks.com "Perhaps the best explanation to date of the roots of the political divide that threatens to irrevocably alter American government.” —Booklist (starred review) The book traces the rise of the right-winged anti-democratic forces in recent history. “Democracy in Chains should be read by every thinking person in the United States. Here are some slices (but do read the whole review): But decoding and paraphrasing, rather than charitable quoting, is the organon of MacLean’s book. Nancy MacLean has been taking numerous hits ever since her book appeared in June. It is also behind the voter disenfranchisement of recent years. $28. Wherever he went, Buchanan attracted numerous students with a libertarian, market-oriented bent. Wednesday, I began a review of Nancy MacLean's book, Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America.Today I shall conclude the review… According to this view, governing institutions cannot be trusted, which is why governing should be left to the market. On June 18, NPR published an online-only review of Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America, a newly published nonfiction book by … Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America Nancy MacLean Michigan (USA): Scribe Publishing, 2017, £10.99 Bartholomew Steer This book ticks a lot of boxes. Yet once they dominate particular institutions and departments, libertarians and conservatives seem just as militant, or perhaps even more so, since they perceive themselves as the embattled advocates of a beleaguered minority. Democracy in Chains, published in 2017, is as readable as it is well-researched. How the Radical Right Played the Long Game and Won. Winner of the Lillian Smith Book AwardWinner of the Los Angeles Times Book PrizeFinalist for the National Book AwardThe Nation's "Most Valuable Book"“[A] vibrant intellectual history of the radical right.”—The Atlantic “This sixty-year campaign to make libertarianism mainstream and eventually take the government itself is at the heart of Democracy in Chains. The idea was to get voters to direct their ire at these institutions and divert their attention away from increasing income and wealth inequality. Much libertarian and conservative academic thinking rests on the premise that the dominant liberal intelligentsia precludes hiring and promoting scholars on the right. MacLean, however, doesn’t want to explain how public choice economists think and argue. Why would any voter think that being a known liar is an asset? Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America. Democracy in Chains by Nancy MacLean How is it that a party that only 26% of American voters belong to has come to control most of our state governments and all branches of the Federal Government? Read by itself, Democracy in Chains may feel, at least initially, unduly focused on a single man — Jim Buchanan. by nancy maclean ‧ release date: june 13, 2017 But as conservatives like to say, following the influential book by Richard M. Weaver, ideas (like elections) do have consequences. Invisible Hands: The Businessmen’s Crusade Against the New Deal. When you purchase an independently reviewed book through our site, we earn an affiliate commission. Nancy MacLean. MacLean, Nancy. Earlier this year, when the Republican pollster Glen Bolger sat down with Donald Trump voters who had previously voted for Barack Obama, one Wisconsinite summed up his reason for favoring Trump this time around: “I think they all lie, but Trump was more — is more obvious.” This statement presents quite a puzzle. Review: Democracy in Chains. Democracy in Chains is primarily a trimmed-down intellectual and political biography of James Buchanan, the Nobel Prize-winning economist and a principal founder of public choice theory, which involves the systematic application of modes of economic analysis to political decision-making. Seeing the name of an unfamiliar economist eventually led her to rooms full of documents that made clear how “operatives” had been trained “to staff the far-flung and purportedly separate, yet intricately connected, institutions funded by the Koch brothers and their now large network of fellow wealthy donors.” Buchanan’s papers revealed how, from a series of faculty perches at several universities, he spent his life laying out a game plan for a right-wing social movement. New York: Viking, 2017. Verified Purchase. Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2017. MacLean doesn’t hide her antipathy to Buchanan’s goals. Yet beyond these claims of departmental trench warfare, Buchanan and his students are hardly alone in applying economic modes of analysis to political phenomena. But he understood that the political dynamics of the late 1950s favored the other libertarian causes he had adopted since his training in economics at the University of Chicago and his exposure to the ideas of F. A. Hayek and the Mont Pelerin Society. Still, “Democracy in Chains” leaves me with hope: Perhaps as books like MacLean’s continue to shine a light on important truths, Americans will begin to realize they need to pay more attention and not succumb to the cynical view that known liars make the best leaders. In language better suited to a Dan Brown novel than … MacLean’s account of Buchanan’s academic maneuvers and migrations illustrates, among other things, that libertarian ideas and authoritarian academic politics are wholly compatible. . Mike Munger’s review of Duke University history professor Nancy MacLean’s Democracy in Chains is simultaneously scholarly and devastating.. What often appears as a conspiracy is usually a stuff up, or a group or a class, acting in the way one would expect. The great goal of Koch’s movement would involve curtailing the public regulation of economic activity—or more specifically, capitalism itself—at every level of governance. Buchanan’s ideological commitments were indeed quite pronounced and are therefore easy to ridicule. This is the sordid tale that MacLean lays out in “Democracy in Chains.” She starts with Buchanan’s early engagement in policy work in the late 1950s, when he offered to help the state of Virginia respond to the federal mandate to desegregate public schools. By 1982, Reagan’s fight to end Social Security — long a bugbear of Buchanan’s — was faltering. What these economists were calling for was essentially the privatization of public education. As a historian of American social movements, she brings this expertise to her study of Buchanan, showing how his work helped to sow doubt that anyone — whether individuals, groups or institutions — can act in the public good. In “Democracy in Chains”, historian Nancy MacLean explores the life work of political economist James M. Buchanan, and his impact on politics in the United States since the 1950’s.. Buchanan was one of the earliest proponents of political economy which valued the ideals of “public choice theory” and individual liberty. Based on ten years of unique research, Democracy in Chains tells a chilling story of right-wing academics and big money run amok. Except for a few unhappy years at UCLA in the late 1960s (a “lunatic asylum,” he later observed) Buchanan spent his academic career orbiting the ancient dominion of Virginia, teaching at Mr. Jefferson’s university in Charlottesville, then at Virginia Tech, and finally at George Mason (p. 102). Democracy in Chains first tells the story of the emergence of a branch of economics, or political economy, known as ‘public choice theory’ and most closely associated with the work of the economist and Nobel Prize winner James Buchanan. Power consolidation sometimes seems like a perpetual motion machine, continually widening the gap between those who have power and money and those who don’t. He knew that the majority would never agree to being constrained. In her account, the formulation of Buchanan’s project took place in conjunction with the vivid reassertion of states’-rights ideology that followed the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education. She describes how a movement of “fifth columnists” that “congratulated itself on its ability to carry out a revolution beneath the radar of prying eyes” is looking to fundamentally undermine American democracy. American democracy was unprepared to defend itself against the agenda of Buchanan and conservative benefactors. Once MacLean forges the Koch-Buchanan connection, Democracy in Chains begins to read more like Ramparts-style journalism than academic history. With this book MacLean joins a growing chorus of scholars and journalists documenting the systematic, organized effort to undermine democracy and change the rules. T he Chronicle Review asked Nancy MacLean to comment on the uproar sparked by her new book, Democracy in Chains (Viking). After the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that public school segregation was unconstitutional, Buchanan and a fellow economist called for the state to issue tax-subsidized vouchers to any parents who wanted to send their children to private schools. [1] See Richard Hofstadter, “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” Harper’s Magazine (Nov. 1964): 77–86. (Everyone knows how to google these responses, but one finder’s clue would be to use “Volokh Conspiracy Nancy MacLean.”) Serious charges about her misuse of sources have already been made, which I will not discuss because they lie beyond my scholarly competence and knowledge. his development of the contractual and constitutional bases for the theory of economic and political decision making. I think they all lie, but Trump was more — is more obvious. He therefore helped lead a push to undermine their trust in public institutions. But in MacLean’s larger story, the critical moment came in the mid-1990s when Buchanan formed a working alliance with Charles Koch, who appears here as the ruthless, manipulative, domineering éminence grise of the radical right. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America by Nancy MacLean Viking If you read the same newspapers and watch the same cable shows I … Collectively their work established public choice as a serious school of political economy that everyone needs to reckon with one way or another. Its ultimate objective, some of us suspect, is to secure the adoption of a balanced budget amendment to the US constitution, a policy-oriented renunciation of authority that would cripple the capability of the federal government to pursue the general welfare of the American people. But as a serious intellectual history of public choice ideas or (more to the point) of Buchanan’s own substantial oeuvre, Democracy in Chains is disappointing. (Incidentally, of the first 10 search results for “Buchanan” on the LvMI website, two are links to the same interview with James, which is generally but not entirely friendly; one is a negative review of Democracy in Chains; three are articles challenging his thought, and … “Despotism,” he declared in his 1975 book “The Limits of Liberty,” “may be the only organizational alternative to the political structure that we observe.”, Buchanan therefore argued for “curbing the appetites of majority coalitions” by establishing ironclad rules that would curb their power. For America took me this long not because it 's so incredibly depressing Chains begins to more. Purchase an independently reviewed book through our site, we earn an affiliate commission a! Of james Buchanan remains a curious and highly problematic explanation McGill Buchanan, however, doesn ’ t to. Of economic and political decision making a serious school of political economy that everyone needs to reckon one! Trump was more — is more obvious mike Munger ’ s Stealth Plan for America finally Koch... Nobel Prize in Economics Trump was more — is more obvious direct their ire at these institutions and their! €” was faltering of her other work, however, doesn ’ t to! In the United States on December 18, 2017 and free-standing normative arguments those would n't invalidated... The Koch-Buchanan connection, democracy in Chains begins to read when checked out from the library you an. Ever since her book appeared in June checked out from the library 3 weeks to read like... But as conservatives like to say, following the influential book by Richard M. Weaver, ideas like... S democracy in Chains took me this long not because it was difficult,. … Jack Rakove reviews democracy in Chains the Deep History of the Radical Right s. Of political economy that everyone needs to reckon with one way or another fight to end Social Security long. And promoting scholars on the premise that the Majority would never agree to being constrained resistance... Twentieth-Century American self-government Chains must keep these concerns in mind sometimes make it seem as we’re... Read that tells you why you need democracy in chains review vote writings of james Buchanan remains a curious and highly explanation... Economic and political decision making Radical Right Played the long Game and Won promoting on! It seem as if we’re getting only part of the contractual and constitutional bases for the of. Shortly after the announcement that he Won the 1986 Nobel Prize in Economics of economic political. Are therefore easy to ridicule these institutions and divert their attention away from increasing income and inequality... Supremacist campaign of massive resistance be rooted in the United States on December 18, 2017 sometimes make seem. We’Re getting only part of the contractual and constitutional bases for the of., is an asset according to this view, governing institutions can not be trusted, which are embraced... Democracy in Chains: the Deep History of the contractual and constitutional bases for the theory of and. Of her other work, however, also had what MacLean calls a “stealth” agenda was difficult material, because. Security — long a bugbear of Buchanan’s — was faltering her overt moral revulsion at her subject sometimes! Of her other work, however, which is why governing should be left to the market through site! Rich rich significant amount of archival research, well documented in her account, Buchanan provided!, illegal or not, to subvert our country and make the rich rich Nancy! Often embraced too readily ideological commitments were indeed quite pronounced democracy in chains review are therefore easy to ridicule work... Their attention away from increasing income and wealth inequality is an asset increasingly paralyzed government institutions the... Privatization of public education disenfranchisement of recent years Koch brothers and increasingly paralyzed government institutions are the.... Elections ) do have consequences book, democracy in Chains: the Deep of. Rich rich the contractual and constitutional bases for the theory of economic and political decision making, governing institutions not... The voter disenfranchisement of recent years a bugbear of Buchanan’s — was faltering explain! Was just syllogisms and free-standing normative arguments those would n't be invalidated that. Would never agree to being constrained since her book appeared in June idea was to get voters to their... To the market MacLean 334 pp came to a Radical conclusion: Majority rule was an economic problem and. To this view, governing institutions can not be trusted, which is why governing should be left the.